Lacoste Pour Homme Cologne by Lacoste

[]Southern_Siren]Amazing, delicious, masculine scent
This fragrance is a new classic. It's strong (as in tough) but not overpowering. I feel it's appropriate for mid-20s+. (It's probably too 'manly' for teens...although some folks could pull it off.)]5[]Jon Remy]OMG? The compliments don't stop!
I absolutely LOVE Lacoste Pour Homme. Although similar to Hugo Boss No. 6 (Boss Bottled), I seem to get more compliments from Lacoste. They are both wonderful and I have them both in my wardrobe and wear them interchangeably. I would say Lacoste is a bit more formal than the Boss No. 6 (which is a more vanilla, low-woodsy fragrance), and contains a bit more spice. I love them BOTH!]5[]Kim]Lacoste Pour Homme Cologne by Lacoste
A real classic!!! Highly recommended it.]5[]JR]Lacoste Pour Homme has changed...
...Lacoste Pour Homme smells kinda sorta like the original. I do NOT like the fact that they have replaced the nice silver printing on the front of the bottle with a dark gray non-metallic printing that is barely readable. One reason I liked Lacoste Pour Homme was the beautiful bottle with its silver labeling (albeit the silver ink has gotten quite thin when compared to the thicker ink of the original). The scent smells the same (it's kind of hard to tell though), but I think the sillage and longevity are nowhere that of the original. I don't know what is going on at P&G, but it seems they keep cutting corners regarding the packaging, thus, it makes me wonder if they are scrimping on the number of essential oils that they put in Lacoste Pour Homme. I'm now having second thoughts on this one. What was once a favorite of mine, may now be retired from my fragrance arsenal. I am not happy with the direction P&G has taken a once-beautiful fragrance found in Lacoste Pour Homme. Very sad, indeed!]3